The table shows the differences in methods of travel by British from the year of 1985 to 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that the total miles traveled per person per year increased by 2000. While the car was the most transport modes of travel by the British during the year 2000, the least favorable one was the bicycle.
To explain in more detail, a distance of 3199 by the vehicle was the highest modes of travel in 1985, followed by local bus and other methods of travel which accounted for around 880 in total. This was nearly half the distance traveled by foot and train which stood approximately 500. Furthermore, Bicycle, long-distance bus and taxi were certainly the lowest one with the taxi taking the least traveled (13 miles).
Likewise, after 15 years of that period, although the car stood the greatest mode of travel which saw roughly 1600 miles increase, bicycle was the lowest method of travel accounting for 41 miles. Moreover, taxi, train long distance bus and other method saw a slight increase. However, miles traveled by walking and local bus went down to 237 and 274 miles respectively
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 79
- Nowadays many people want to buy famous brands of clothes cars and other items What are the reasons for this Do you think it is a positive or a negative development 86
- Some say old people should continue to work, if their condition allows them to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing games teaches us about life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80208333333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40548328333 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552083333333 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7934367817 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.444444444 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123362038295 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610330390885 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449788216908 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976625951123 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385782128795 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.