The given column chart compares the count of the accidents and the injuries by five categories of transportation in 2002. An interesting point to be noted from the graph that, the chance of an injury was lowest in Light Rail in that year.
Overall analysis, the unit of the numbers is PMT(Passenger Miles Travelled). The numbers per 100 million PMT is represented by Y axis whereas the 5 different modes of transportation are indicated by X axis. Furthermore, the highest number of incidents was observed in Demand Response while the lowest count was for commuter rail.
In 2002, apart from Commuter Rail, every other mode of transportation had more that 50 incidents. While, this number was lowest with around 25, the maximum accidents represented by Demand Response transportation with just above 250. When it comes to the number of injuries, the minimum number was around 20 which was happened in commuter rail whereas the highest number was in Demand Response with more that 150.
Stating further, the chance of an injury was little in Light Rail as the incident and injury ratio was around 70:40 but the high injury chance was observed in commuter rail with 25:20 ratio between accidents and injuries.
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 73
- The graph shows Underground Station Passenger Numbers in London. 78
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, whereas, while, apart from, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0099009901 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71182316965 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529702970297 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1045039736 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.444444444 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205903679045 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103650177977 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693311840281 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138483857309 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645787363372 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.