Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
There has been a constant drumbeat over whether employees feel more content when they have a variety of jobs to do. While people commonly suggest that doing various tasks is stressful, it is my firm belief that dealing with different situations is a critical factor in career satisfaction. The reasons go as follows.
First and foremost, accomplishment plays an essential role in people's satisfaction, and coping with various tasks provides employees with more achievement. My father's experience is a compelling example. About eight years ago, my father had worked in a post office. Every day, he had to deal with lots of mails and checked if there is anything wrong with the mail address, which was quite tedious and boring for my father. Therefore, my dad decided to find another job, and later he switched to be a manager in a Chinese marketing agency. Since marketing puts stress on creativity, to improve novelty, my dad did lots of tasks in one day. As a result, he felt very excited every day he went to work, and he accomplished many types of tasks then. Now, he has felt a sense of satisfaction deeply.
Besides, the more new things people learn in the workplace, the more satisfaction they feel in the workplace. For instance, my friend, Kevin, works as a software developer in a startup. Several weeks ago, we chatted and discussed the works he does. He said that since the company just started for a few months, there are lots of tasks to do. Therefore, every day, he can learn about new abilities, such as software testing, product testing, and how to construct a high-performance system. By doing many types of tasks, he feels quite content toward his works. For this reason, I believe that workers who learn new things are more satisfied.
In light of the reasons mentioned above, I firmly believe that accomplishing a variety of works is essential for workers to be content in careers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 327.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8623853211 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74884595486 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565749235474 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2431476723 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6842105263 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2105263158 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31578947368 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208424801358 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595332192779 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646385980658 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130335517333 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869398118438 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.