The chart shows the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 & 2010.
The two pie charts show English students' proportion at one university, who can speak different languages apart from their native language, during 2000 and 2010.
Overall, in both years, the most significant languages were Spanish and another language, which together accounted for over half the proportion of language, while german language and other kinds of language generated the least proportion of speaking language in England. In all type of language were spoken by the university students, was only minimal range over the 10 years.
According to the pie charts, 20% of students spoke only the native language in 2000, and this showed a fell off about 10% in 2005. Likewise, in 2000, french spoke 10% of students, which dropped marginally to 10% a decade later. Furthermore, the proportion of german language remained the same over the 10 years.
Moreover, the remaining proportion of languages, there was about 5% growth in the language of Spain, another language, and to other languages to 35%, 20%, and 15%, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 61
- The chart shows the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 & 2010. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
- The maps below show exports of rubber ducks from 2013 to 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, likewise, moreover, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35542168675 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70856664768 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578313253012 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6883060369 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341039597043 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150751644 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11027517283 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211281590712 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111745305608 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.