More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unaid work such as teaching and building houses for communities in poorer countries. What are the reasons for this? Who benefits more from this, the cummunities or these young people.
A growing number of young adults living in rich countries are allocating their short time to volunteer to help residents in developing nations. There are some reasons for this phenomenon, and I believe that these voluntary jobs bring benefits equally for both these youngsters and the local communities.
On the one hand, several main causes are considered contributing to the significant rise in voluntary activities of the young in wealthy countries. Mainly, travelling to different isolated parts of the world, these adults considerably have chances of networking and socializing with people from all walks of life; therefore, they could expand their social circle. Moreover, understandably volunteers also have a sense of community when doing unpaid work. Finally, the hands-on experiences young adults gain from real life help put what they have learnt into practice. As a result of this, these young people can become competitive candidates in the job market.
On the other hand, I consider that local habittants in poorer countries and volunteers in rich nations achieve equally efficient results when voluntary work is implemented. Firstly, learning a new language from a free class, the job situation of the local communities could be improved more. For example, the local residents’ ability to speak English fluently, which is acquired from unpaid courses, might help them to seek a decent job in tourism industry. In addition, exposing to new cultures through travelling allows young adults discover and experience the novelty in authentic life. For instance, the more trips the young travel, the more local food and traditional clothes they may sample and try wearing.
In conclusion, Obviously there are several causes leading to the free support of the young in developed countries for the local in developing nations, and I would argue that the positive impacts of the voluntary activities are just as equal as for both of these people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | IVANTRUONG | 84 | view |
- Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- the global sales of 5 mobile phone brands 73
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their time. Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 67
- Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later. Some people think that having these people to give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about dangers of committing a crime. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fluently, which is acquired from unpaid courses, might help them to seek a decen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39158576052 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81905073677 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57928802589 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0120793479 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.153846154 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298773319978 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975145093613 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504317262031 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169271576005 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039570018131 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.