Government should spend more money on railways than roads.
To what extend do you agree or disagree.
It is argued that, a country should use more funds on constructing or renovating railway lines than roads. This essay agree that, it is beneficial to have more railways than roads, especially with increased road carnage happening due to reckless driving. The benefits of using train as a mode of transport will be highlighted, as well as for road system. Secondly, relevant example will be given and a conclusion will be included, as disadvantages of using road transport system discussed.
People are dying almost everyday, which is saddening due to road carnage. Governments should invest more money in construction or refurbishment of railway lines. Few accidents occur with train, though they are very fatal if they do happen. There are a lot of people who are drinking and driving, thereby causing accidents and death of innocent souls. Trains are efficient and they are monitored, if they happen it is usually caused by a car or bus which failed to give way to the train as it try to beat it up before crossing the railway line. For instance, there was an accident which happened in Harare and claim life of 30 people. It happened because the driver could not give way to the train.
On the other hand, road transport can be very efficient and fast, if one is driving carefully . Privacy is maintained especially when travelling as a family, which the train does not offer. Some trains are very slow, mentioning the outdated ones which are commonly found in under-developing and developing countries. A country should divide more money for construction and maintenance of roads, for fast and convenient way if travel.
In conclusion, nothing is compared to loss of human life, therefore the benefits of using railway transport outweigh the use of road system. There are some train which are faster and convenient, such as, gautrain or bullet train. More funds should be allocated for railways, as well as purchasing modern trains which are trending.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 67
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world. 56
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 56
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'agrees'.
Suggestion: agrees
...ng railway lines than roads. This essay agree that, it is beneficial to have more rai...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...discussed. People are dying almost everyday, which is saddening due to road carnage...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 94, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nt and fast, if one is driving carefully . Privacy is maintained especially when t...
^^
Line 13, column 157, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'trains'?
Suggestion: trains
... the use of road system. There are some train which are faster and convenient, such a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as for, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0244648318 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7675790823 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54128440367 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3868575393 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2777777778 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153754005131 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555035048516 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862551830774 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932450139177 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036721826214 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.