Every year language die out. some people think that this is not important. Because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.
From the ancient time to modern world, various people lived in the earth and they are breathing now. But, they have been a plethora of differences nation, culture,dresses and specialy languages which is used to communicate to data and information in each other. Sure enough, many language die out in every year then some people despite that because of they believe life will be simple if there are fewer languages in the world. However, I completely disagree with this assertion.
Furthermore, I glad to say, I have a plethora of reason for negetively this statement. Firstly, destroy the human tongue diversity. Various nations were living here and they were speaking their native nernacular. Our planet had been amezing through by this diversity. As an example, The world beautiful and feelingfull language was hindi. If it is die out in the world then lost to us naturally important vernacular. Secondly, Bereave some languages while may be dying out of their nations. Their mother's tongue was unique to their group. Significantly, countryside people have to face this incidence because of their language extraordinary rarely. Those villages moved to the town and they habited to talk a famous language which was spoken in the town area. Consequently, Villagers native language dies out with their old people.
In contrast, some are faced Verble problem when they went abroad because by this reason in language variation. However, If our planet has few languages, all people could speak very well. Also, we will be creating a global village with one language.
To sum up, after looking above paragraphs, There era many pros and cons of this statement. But, I believe that the world should have language diversity for variations of the native.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 84
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel sources in Australian and France in 1980 and 2000 61
- The graph below given information from the 2008 report about the consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with a projection until 2030. 78
- The table below give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in European countries 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , dresses
... plethora of differences nation, culture,dresses and specialy languages which is used to...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 342, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because they' instead.
Suggestion: because they
...very year then some people despite that because of they believe life will be simple if there ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ful and feelingfull language was hindi. If it is die out in the world then lost to...
^^
Line 3, column 642, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...because of their language extraordinary rarely. Those villages moved to the town and t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12587412587 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71904128064 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594405594406 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1500777604 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.3 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414898222275 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111620440867 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128395458988 0.0667982634062 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239284333619 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108449181162 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.