Loyalty is the most important quality in choosing a friend
There have been several disputed discussion on whether loyalty should be undertaken as a parameter while choosing the friend or not. As for everything, there are always two sides to every question. Personally, I believe that a friend should be fair towards you. I feel this for two reasons, which I explore in the following essay.
First of all, Loyal friends are always helpful; Moreover, these friends are kind in nature; additionally, these friends do not lie, so I believe that loyal friends are precious, just like a diamond. My personal experience is a compelling example of this; About ten years ago, I enrolled in the history class, where I got an assignment on Russian history. I found myself confused as Russian history was not familiar prompt, but my Classmate, whose name was Ms. Aditi, helped me out for the completion of this project. She became a savior for me, and got a prize from a teacher for wrote such a beautiful assignment; this incident made my mind that friend should be one who is loyal towards you.
Secondly, a friend should be one who helps in a difficult situation, and here a problematic situation means a job where your luck is not favored you. For better understanding, let us look at the example of My friend Mr. Sunny Yadav; he lost his father at the age of ten, and which created a massive responsibility on his shoulder towards his family. He was the only earning person in the family; however, he did not fulfill his family needs reason being his income was meager. He found a lady, in the work station who helped him a lot in his difficult situation, and that lady was his wife today.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that loyalty places a significant factor while deciding a friend. This is because if a person is loyal, then that person also includes the quality of helping others in any situation and because these person does not take advantage of the weakness of others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-13 | Siyuanzhao | 76 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | Siyuanzhao | 66 | view |
| 2022-03-08 | Ayasha_Khan | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | jullu | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | Manu2525 | 76 | view |
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? 60
- TOEFL T P O 18 Integrated Writing Task extinction of the Torreya Taxifoha 52
- The extended family is less important now than it was in the past. 66
- It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends. 70
- IT IS MORE IMPORTANT TO KEEP YOUR OLD FRIENDS THAN IS TO MAKE NEW FRIENDS 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 695, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...should be one who is loyal towards you. Secondly, a friend should be one who hel...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 230, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this person' or 'these people', 'these persons'?
Suggestion: this person; these people; these persons
...ing others in any situation and because these person does not take advantage of the weakness...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, as for, i feel, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72861356932 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63582485768 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572271386431 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6218504435 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149062633839 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530489397295 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640912992639 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959940137738 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039409493886 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.