Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The topic of public transport has been a hot topic since the invention of engine. Politicians, statesmen and billionaires all have their own opinions. One of the most important method of public transport is railways.
Railways are one of the best ways to get around in urban areas were road congestion is a nightmare. It's usually faster than cars as trains move without any hindrance. They are also very environmentally friendly as most trains are electric these days. They also have the benefit of being quieter and calmer than most cars. If we look at the financials, the railways take the lead here too for being more economical.There is also no hassle of finding and paying for parking. For all these reasons I believe it's very important for the government to pay more heed to railways infrastructure and provide more funding. It will not only improve daily commutes for people but also have a long-term effect of improving the economy and standards of living as is evident by a lot of research.
Most things in life has both pros and cons. The railways is no exception. The most major drawback is the issue of timing. You have to schedule your whole day around the times of arrivals and departures of trains. If you over sleep or if you face and emergency, the railways is not a reliable option. Another drawback for some might be the long commutes with multiple connections. If a trains is late, this can throw your whole schedule off. So I believe it's reasonable to ask government to spend more money on roads. This will give people more flexibility and mobility.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Dungphung | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 95
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports center now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The bar chart below shows top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...as were road congestion is a nightmare. Its usually faster than cars as trains move...
^^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...lead here too for being more economical.There is also no hassle of finding and paying...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 58, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...fe has both pros and cons. The railways is no exception. The most major drawback i...
^^
Line 9, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of arrivals and departures of trains. If you over sleep or if you face and eme...
^^
Line 9, column 386, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a train' or simply 'trains'?
Suggestion: a train; trains
... commutes with multiple connections. If a trains is late, this can throw your whole sche...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7700729927 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71012618752 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580291970803 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1827047664 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.7894736842 106.682146367 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4210526316 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.21052631579 7.06120827912 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135476462221 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400287964191 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471079563256 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822279241658 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772062398968 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.0946893788 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.79 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.