In many countries, people today are living in a "throwaway society", where things are used in a short time and then thrown away. What are its causes. What are its problems.
The phenomenon of “throwaway societies» has become a wild-spread and global issue in the modern world. There seem to be several reasons and causes of this challenge which will be discussed in this essay.
Speaking about possible reasons, first of all, the persistent increasing of products, consumed by the population, seems to be the paramount issue. In other words, nowadays, people prefer purchasing a new item instead of repairing a broken one, contributing to the growth of production. Another significant reason for this trend appear to be the global market which facilitates the spreading of disposable goods, such as plastic bottles and dishes. In many cases, this plastic utensil should be recycled, however, there are many countries, which cannot manage this challenge and just gathers all litters in remote areas. Finally, the economy of many countries was build in the way, which requires annual growth. Thus, for encouraging of an efficient market and, as a result, a high level of revenue, the industry has become to produce low-quality products. So, customers have to update their stuff and equipment more quickly.
When it comes to possible causes, no doubts, aggravation of litters problem has become the paramount consequence of “throwaway society” and a burning issue for each country. For instance, no end of plastic utensil seems to be contained in the world ocean. Also, gathering rubbish on remote locations without recycling influence negatively on the local environment, contributing to contamination of soil, water, and air. Finally, been generally accepted fact, the industrial growth participates in reasons of the global warming issue.
All in all, the main reasons for “throwaway societies» due to the high-level of humans consumption and industrial production seems to lead to global ecological problems, which should be taking into consideration by all countries as soon as possible.
- Nowadays in many countries woman have full time jobs. therefore, it is logical to share household task evenly between man and woman. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement. 11
- When new towns are planned, it is important to build more public parks or sports facilities than shopping centers for people to spend their free time. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people believe that a country becomes more interesting and develops faster when its population includes a mixture of different nationalities and cultures. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people believe that people who do physical work should be paid on par with the people who have high-level degreesDo you agree or disagree? 73
- In many countries, people today are living in a "throwaway society", where things are used in a short time and then thrown away. What are its causes. What are its problems. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, thus, for instance, no doubt, speaking about, such as, as a result, first of all, in many cases, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51170568562 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07460651489 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585284280936 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4118408529 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.714285714 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0607994882885 0.244688304435 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0203889408955 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.025541257357 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0407793285915 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00525487229257 0.056905535591 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.