The chart below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008
The bar charts provide information about graduate and postgraduate college students of the UK worked non full-time in 2008.
Overall, the numbers of Futher study were the highest between the given types of work for both graduate and postgraduate students, while Voluntary work showed the lowest rate.
Looking at the details for graduate students, it can be seen that students learned Further study after leaving college showed the highest number at 29,665. The figure of Part-time workers were higher compared to unemployees, showing 17,735 and 16,235 respectively. The smallest number of students did Voluntary work was the lowest at 3,500.
By contrast, the number of postgraduate students chose Further study were higher than Part-time workers, at 2,725 and 2,535 in turn. Unemployees were less than both students did Part-time work and Further study, at 1,625. The lowest number of postgraduate students was at Voluntary work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | pateldhruv1708 | 91 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Noah1997 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | pateldhruv1708 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | trunghn1 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | AlisherBabajonov | 56 | view |
- Time schoolchildren (10-11 years old) spend on different home activities 56
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 78
- The first chart below shows how many energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 73
- Time schoolchildren 10 11 years old spend on different home activities 46
- The chart below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 145.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48965517241 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47010008196 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65874367979 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537931034483 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1089929934 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323530476557 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159032718248 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926028477671 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225566218574 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975996176218 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.