prices of house
The bar chart provides information regarding the percentage increase or decrease of average prices of house five towns from 1990 to 2002 compared with 1989.
In general, most cities experienced increase in their average of house prices.
A more detailed look at the graph reveals that the most remarkable change was happened on that of the capital city of Japan, Tokyo. In 1989, it was below 5% but growth rapidly to around 12 percent in 1996-2002. This tremendous change was followed by the house price in New York (USA) which was -5% in the former year but suddenly stood at 5% in the later pointed years. Furthermore, both Madrid (Spain) and Tokyo (Japan) experienced the same rate of average house prices change (increased by around 2%). While the other 4 countries had higher price of house in 1996-2002, Frankfurt had lower house sale which was by around 1% (from 3% to 2%).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-16 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-29 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
- The graph shows seasonal water consumption in four towns rewrite alam 63
- The table below presents the number of children ever born to women aged 40-44 years in Australia for each year the information was collected since 1981. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where rel 83
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.You are a student at an English language school in Brighton and are living in private accommodation with other flat mates. You have not had hot water or heating for some time. The landlord’s workmen have trie 80
- Is television harmful to children? 85
- average yearly spending by Americans on mobile and landline phone services 80
of average prices of house five towns
of average prices of house in five towns
most cities experienced increase
most cities experienced the increase
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Words: 152 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 152 200
No. of Characters: 697 1000
No. of Different Words: 94 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.511 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.586 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.461 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 45 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 31 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 22 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 13 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.714 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.921 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 1 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.457 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.646 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.099 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4