Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has had a negative effect on young people’s reading and writing skills
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Opinion are divided on whether usage of modern device like computers and mobile phones to communication become more popular had a potential cost on young generation those who have literacy skills or not. I am of opinion that these all rely on their purpose.
Perhaps the strongest argument is that high-tech gadgets have some detrimental effects in term of games and forming bad habit literacy. With respect to the former, most of gamer who join stimulated online games such as fighting and driving are not require reading and writing skills and all they have to do is just coordination skills. Another point need to be consideration is that thank to development of high-tech, several big company as Microsoft created good production of word office having convenient functions, which means youngsters who using these software could correct grammatical automatically. This can lead to form negative habit literacy if users make it for a long-term.
Notwithstanding aforementioned argument that not all children waste their times to play video game and for some. Accessing the internet throughout using high-tech produce positive affects. This is because those are consider to be a gateway to open an unlimited source of information. For instance, the children could read some useful book on the internet to enrich their vocabularies. Furthermore, by distance learning education, they have an opportunity to type homework directly on the computer and handout to their teacher by email. For these reasons, it could also argued that the competency in communication skills by computer is as important as handwriting.
In brief, it is indisputable fact that the developments of using either the computer or mobile phones for communication had impacted negatively on young people’s literacy skills. However, I firmly believe that it is individually based on their purpose.
- Some people think that students at school and university can learn more from teachers and lessons than from TV and the internet.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has had a negative effect on young people’s reading and writing skillsTo what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Many people keep pets.Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of keeping pets for individuals and for society? 78
- Technology has been largely integrated in education and in the future robots will even take the role of teachers To what extend do you agree or disagree 61
- Some parents go abroad for work, taking their families with themDo the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of keeping pets for individuals and for society? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'required'.
Suggestion: required
...es such as fighting and driving are not require reading and writing skills and all they...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 553, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this software' or 'these softwares'?
Suggestion: this software; these softwares
...tions, which means youngsters who using these software could correct grammatical automatically...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 676, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...ive habit literacy if users make it for a long-term. Notwithstanding aforementioned ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 216, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
...tive affects. This is because those are consider to be a gateway to open an unlimited so...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 570, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'argue'
Suggestion: argue
...email. For these reasons, it could also argued that the competency in communication sk...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, for instance, in brief, such as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41496598639 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04792272539 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608843537415 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.032984131 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236627071647 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734556507755 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917217684775 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153932367234 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847619854364 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.