there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to him were actually painted by him.
first there is something inconsistent about the way the woman in the portrait is dressed.
second, this in this painting the elements of light and shadow do not fit together.
third, examination of the back of the painting reveals that it was painted on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together.
The article states that one specific painting (an elderly woman in a dress) is not actually the work of Rembrandt; however the professor refutes with this claim. For her disagreement, she upholds three major reasons which are completely against all claims in the reading. In the following, these solid proofs will be discussed thoroughly.
First, the reading says that this painting is not an original work as the way the woman is dressed is not like Rembrandt's other paintings. On the other hand, the lecturer rejects this idea insomuch as she concedes that a fore-color had been added to the painting about one hundred years after the painter had finished his job. Probably, this action had been done in order to increase the value of the painting.
Second, the passage posits that this painting does not follow the other works of the painter from light and shadow perspectives, but the lecturer opposes this idea. She claims that the original painting, before the added color, had simple light-color cloth exactly like other paintings of the artist. This color was so realistic which resembled the expected job of the painter and illuminated the face of the elderly woman.
Third, by diverse analyses, the author accepts that the painting was painted on several pieces of wood which is against the original work of the artist. However, the lecturer does not agree with this idea owing to the fact that he claims these additional peices, as well as the extra paint, had been added to that masterpiece afterwards. Therefore, the scholars have found that the original painting was painted on a single piece of wood. Moreover, the professor claims that this piece of wood is from the same tree which another painting of the artist was painted on it. That painting is a self-portrait of the Rembrandt with a hat.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 66 | view |
- Because of its remote location, only a few species of plants and animals thrived on Easter Island, and the water surrounding it contained very few fish. Nevertheless, beginning with extremely limited resources on an isolated island, the native people achi 3
- TPO 12 independent focusing on one thing is better than knowing basic things about diverse majors 90
- TPO 15 integrated Cane toads must be controlled by three methods building a national fence killing them developing a disease causing virus 80
- TPO OG2 integrated TV shows with professors are good for everybody as teachers will become famous universities earn more donations and people learn real in depth knowledgeable things 80
- TPO 36 independent agree or not for the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children than to spend money on universities 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 306.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96078431373 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49119942732 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513071895425 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8715834512 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.428571429 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291825386608 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122057699914 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950789479545 0.0662205650399 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180001903262 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841971896862 0.0443174109184 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.