Central and local governments make a frantic attempt to promote festivals to create a lot of revenue. Some people think this money should be invested in social programmes for the poor.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Nowadays, authority tries to find strategies to increase people's lifestyle. While, government conducts efforts for providing festivals to gain income, a number of human beings arguing that this money should be directed to people who suffers from poverty. I partially disagree with this statement.
On the one hand, conducting festivals will develop several industries, and also culture of this country. Festivals directed to demonstrate country's culture, making them attract tourists attention. While, foreigners come to involve holiday they willing to pay money and purchase a wide range of souvenirs. This main factor increase the state of tourist industry. Secondly, conducting festivals opens several job opportunities. People can contribute in preparation of festival or produce things such as souvenirs or paintings. It might increase loyality of local people to earn money. I am confident of these motions might increase people's life condition.
However, festivals occur crowded people and pollution, also all society might not participate to it. Authority should take care about people with poverty. If poor society increase in country they might appear inner cities such as India. People divide into two parts where wealthy and poverty people. Nevertheless, the crime rate might be increase in this country which humans comment robbery in order to find money to live. In my opinion government should invest people due to restrict stratifications in this country.
To sum up, although onset festivals have tendency to develop a number of industries and increase social condition, the authority should take care about poor human beings in order to bring to a stand stratification.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-13 | buitony | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-07 | ayofigo | 67 | view |
| 2020-07-06 | phil999 | 67 | view |
| 2020-04-28 | hieunganngan | 43 | view |
| 2020-04-24 | hieunganngan | 61 | view |
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 84
- There are several number of industries which constitutes a government Although the authority infers economic progression is the vital aspect of the path to development some people believe that there are other progresses which should be in same position wi 56
- Children nowadays watch significantly more television than in the past, which reduces their activity levels accordingly. Why is this the case?What measures can you suggest to encourage higher levels of activity among children? 61
- Central and local governments make a frantic attempt to promote festivals to create a lot of revenue Some people think this money should be invested in social programmes for the poor To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel and work in a foreign country Others say that these are not the only reason why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, in fact, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56589147287 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81072967573 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616279069767 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8085387237 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7777777778 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3333333333 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271073364472 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875126049856 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674049992695 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173970636679 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660123715533 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.43 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.