Central and local governments make a frantic attempt to promote festivals to create a lot of revenue. Some people think this money should be invested in social programmes for the poor. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
The local and central governments make desperate attempts in the promotion of festivals, in order to generate massive revenue. However, many believe this financial investment ought to be used to create social programmes for the poor. I completely agree with this view because this will help alleviate the poor masses from poverty and support them into gaining employment.
There are ample of reasons why the government should invest in social programmes for the poor rather than pursue the promotion of festivals. One of the major reason is that, social programmes will introduce variety of skills for poor people to learn and create an avenue for self-employment and other job positions in the society. Invariably, this will create more revenue for the government compared to festivals and reduce dependence on social benefits from poor citizens. For example, according to the minister of labour in Turkey, the introduction of social intervention programmes in 2018, led to the creation of more jobs, particularly self-employment, thus, a direct result of skills acquired from social programs.
Nevertheless, many argue that indeed, the government promoting festivals will generate huge revenue and as a result increase tourist investments and add financial gains to the economy. This, however cannot be compared to the long term benefits of eradicating the poverty levels in the society. Reducing poverty levels in the society is far more important, again, because this will help reduce crime levels, encourage more start-up businesses and ultimately boost steadily the economy of the country.
In conclusion, even though promoting festivals can bring revenue and tourist to the society, l believe this a fraction of the benefits of creating socal programmes for the poor masses, as this can bring new skills, employment opportunities and grow the economy of the society in tremendous proportions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-13 | buitony | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-07 | ayofigo | 67 | view |
| 2020-07-06 | phil999 | 67 | view |
| 2020-04-28 | hieunganngan | 43 | view |
| 2020-04-24 | hieunganngan | 61 | view |
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task In Britain when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them Sometimes the government has to pay for this care Who do you think should pay f 56
- In Britain when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them Sometimes the government has to pay for this care Who do you think should pay for this care the government or the family Give 61
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What are the causes of these pattern and measures to solve them 78
- Some people think that young people should go to university to further their education while others think they should be encouraged to work as car mechanics or builders etc to serve society Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing new skills, employment opportunities and grow the economy of the society in t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47118644068 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91479302619 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542372881356 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.631923722 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.727272727 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8181818182 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374707901697 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152542699458 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070669737948 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230734782711 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894255540871 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.