Some people say that the government should increase the tax on petrol in order to decrease traffic and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some individuals indeed argue that the government imposing an increase in rates of taxation on gasoline can decline the number of vehicles and resultant pollution. While I agree that this strategy can be partly effective, I believe that using other renewable sources of energy can be more sustainable in terms of alleviating the seriousness of traffic and pollution problems.
On the one hand, the rising gasoline tax can contribute to a decline in traffic and pollution. it is based on a classical economic theory that the higher the price, the lower the quantity demanded. thus, due to increasing the price of petrol, this can afterwards lead to alleviation in terms of traffic and air problem through a decrease in the number of users of this energy. take Iran as an example. although this country is renowned for its enormous oil resources, the government determined to put up the tax on gasoline but still carry out the maintenance in public transportations prices. As a result, citizens had to find other alternative options; and convincing evidence has shown that the number of people using public means of transport, namely bus, tram and metro has considerably gone up rather than the past.
On the other hand, the usage of alternative renewable energies can help to address such issues more sustainably. they are considered clean and eco-friendly because they emit low or zero carbon footprint and greenhouse gas into the environment. thus, by doing this can people contribute to cutting back on air pollution. take Vietnam, the country that has a high number of sunny hours per year as an example. If the government can make use of this huge advantage and utilize solar power to run public vehicles with a cheap fare, they can encourage more citizens to travel through eco-friendly cheap buses.
In conclusion, although it cannot be denied that imposing an increase in the gasoline taxes can contribute to a decline in traffic and pollution, I have a conviction that it is better to use renewable energies to achieve the same goals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | lauranguyen_97 | 67 | view |
- Some people say that the government should increase the tax on petrol in order to decrease traffic and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Computer technologies are more accessible and cheaper, as a result, more adults’ work at home and children study at home. Is this a positive or negative development? 84
- Many people believe that teachers should take responsibilities for their students to judge what is right or wrong and behave well, while other feel that teachers should only teach academic subjects. Discuss both view and give your own opinion. 78
- Some people say that to solve today’s global program every nation should have a good relationship with other nations. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What do you think about cooperation and communication between countries? 84
- Advertisement brings many negative effects on people and the society. What are these effects? How to solve this problem? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is true that some individuals argue t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of traffic and pollution problems. On the one hand, the rising gasoline tax...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... to a decline in traffic and pollution. it is based on a classical economic theory...
^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...price, the lower the quantity demanded. thus, due to increasing the price of petrol,...
^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Take
... in the number of users of this energy. take Iran as an example. although this count...
^^^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...f this energy. take Iran as an example. although this country is renowned for its enormo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ably gone up rather than the past. On the other hand, the usage of alternat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... such issues in a more sustainable way. they are considered clean and eco-friendly b...
^^^^
Line 9, column 266, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...nd greenhouse gas into the environment. thus, by doing this can people contribute to...
^^^^
Line 9, column 342, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Take
...ibute to cutting back on air pollution. take Vietnam, the country that has a high nu...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... through eco-friendly cheap buses. In conclusion, although it cannot be den...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gies to achieve the same goal.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02305475504 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83310953659 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521613832853 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0247235103 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7857142857 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.01903807615 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151691208999 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538592624031 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532848336573 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100683438442 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305459327013 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.