Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays, it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together.
These days the subject of having meals with our family is a gold reason to forget machinery life which pushes us to forget our feeling about our family and friends. Sometimes it is necessary to have a discussion with your family about some issues and to find a solution to deal with these problems.
It seems that advances in technology cause push many people to don’t have physical communication for even a little talking with their family. These days distant dose not meaning for people around the world. For instance, social media the only way of connection between a large of individuals. However, release feelings in cyberspace have a strong choice in the relationship. It can’t be a good choice to provide our feeling to our family. To sum up, technology is coming to the place of the stage of our relationship.
Another factor in increasing this destructive problem in the developed country which exerts an effect on the family is that humankind was a social creature from a long time age. It means that in the eastern country, every people try to live alone and the face with an un-solution problem that needs a community to support him for these mental and physical issues. To find addition to the family, it can be played a significant role like the small group of people which in one place for eating meals gettogether share experiences. As a result, having time to spend cyberspace with family is providing an opportunity to obtain a novel way to solve the problem.
In conclusion, the state of the art devices leads to produce a gap between the member of every family and the family can be a good chance for solving our problem. Nonetheless, by the development of technology will have seen that we destructive have any as a family and Cybernet will be our family in opportunity next decades.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | amir_gha67 | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | prsghsm | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | NIMA SAEEDI | 76 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | sparktseng | 60 | view |
| 2019-05-02 | handsomepot | 90 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Nowadays, it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together. 60
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends? 60
- Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Other think access to much information creates problem Which view do you agree with Use specific reason and examples to support your answer 76
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t humankind was a social creature from a long time age. It means that in the east...
^^
Line 15, column 20, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...ve the problem. In conclusion, the state of the art devices leads to produce a gap between ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nonetheless, so, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8380952381 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72477505365 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51746031746 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5319207856 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.857142857 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217948015143 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777800341127 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448062078734 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140464097535 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172917045292 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.