Do you agree with the following statement? Universities should give the same amount of money to their student’s sports activities as they give to their university libraries. Use specific examples and reasons to support your answer.
Yes, I agree with the statement universities should give the same amount of money to their student’s sports activities as they give to their university libraries. When we lean in a school or university some students are good at sports, they took all efforts and never miss the chance to their talent. Also, they represent their universities at the state or national level. In this case, the university needs to appreciate these students and also fulfill their requirements.
Firstly, we all know the sport is as important as another subject, playing sport will enhance stamina and help to stay active. There are some universities and schools were playing a sport is compulsory. In this case, universities will provide all essential pieces of equipment to students, but also some universities only focused on the study and not appreciate any kind of sport. In that case, some students who are good at sports will not able to play and they do not get a chance to show their hard work and talent. While we all know that playing a sport is also compulsory.
Secondly, some students choose their career as sports person but sometimes they did not get significant knowledge and equipment from college or universities. Where they lost their confidence as a player and do not play and left with the no option rather than studying, I think in this case universities should appreciate the student’s financially and sponsors scholarship and encourage their talent, as they encourage the students who are good at studies. So, we will get a good player who represents our country or state.
In conclusion, I agree with the statement because I think sports is having the same importance as subjects and the library has. That will encourage the students who choose their career as a sportsperson.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Pandalove | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | NIMA SAEEDI | 81 | view |
- Learning about the past has no value for those living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- IN AN ATTEMPT TO IMPROVE HIGHWAY SAFETY PRUNTY COUNTRY LAST YEAR LOWERED ITS SPEED LIMITS FROM 55 TO 45 MILES PER HOUR ON ALL COUNTRY HIGHWAYS. BUT THIS EFFORT HAS FAILED; THE NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS HAS NOT DECREASED, AND, BASED ON REPORT BY HIGHWAY PETROL, 69
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree that progress is always good Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 85
- PEOPLES BEHAVIOUR IS LARGELY DETERMINED BY FORCES NOT OF THEIR OWN MAKING 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nce to show their hard work and talent. While we all know that playing a sport is als...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, i think, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 52.1666666667 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 300.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99333333333 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85458500584 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466666666667 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8641121115 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385707755323 0.236089414692 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154342816499 0.076458572812 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166166798112 0.0737576698707 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257544521208 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14190487389 0.0645574589148 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 86.8835125448 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.