Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In this modern world, teachers use different approaches to motivate students in order to do their projects. I am of the opinion that, students will gain more benefits when they do their projects in the group with other students. I feel this way for reasons, which I will elaborate in the following essay.
To begin with, working as a team would help students to learn from each other. There are some things that a student does not know about and he or she can use other members’ knowledge to increase his or her information level. For instance, two years ago when I was a sophomore student, I took a course in a dynamic of structures and the professor introduced the assignment to me and two other students. The topic was on my difficulties with the course, so I hesitated that I could finish the assignment. In order to solve the problem, I went to other students and asked them to declare the subject to me. Moreover, they described the subject and I had learned what I had been struggling for almost two years.
Secondly, students with the background of a team working are more seem to be successful in their future working life. Nowadays, great companies are looking for employees who could do his or her best in the frame of a team. Consequently, it is beneficial for students to learn this task as an opportunity in their school career. My own experience is convincing evidence of this. As a thirty-year-old man who works for Microsoft company, I have the advantage of the knowledge of team working between other applicants. This merit helps me to be chosen between about three thousand people who applied for the job. Moreover, with this knowledge and background, I am a prosperous employee in my career. Also, last year I introduced as a successful employee of the year, and without this background from my school career, I would not be able to reach this glory in my career.
In conclusion, I feel strongly that it is more effective for students to do their assignments as a part of the team. This is because such experiences help students to fill their voids of knowledge with the information of other members of a group and help these students to have the advantage of others in their future work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to su 60
- TPO 30 66
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a "burning mirror": a p 66
- TPO 31 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 714, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d been struggling for almost two years. Secondly, students with the background o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68542199488 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79677780747 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483375959079 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2928813954 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4210526316 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5789473684 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.89473684211 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241727185083 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833253894221 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674161752445 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172251142691 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511810793444 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.