Some people think that having people from different nationalities and cultural backgrounds living together in the same country makes the country develop faster. Do you agree?
Throughout history, leaders of a nation would be debating between themselves if having people from different cultures living together is a good thing. Even wars were waged over a country’s cultural and nationality demographics. Some countries do not encourage different cultures on their people, while some other countries encourage them. It is a good question and I think nationality and cultural diversification help a country’s development.
Since the oldest days of human civilization, different nations were learning from eachother. For example, ancient Greek philosophers and mathematicians travelled the world to broaden their views and learn new things. It is no coincidence that democratic ancient Greece was the most powerful civilization in their respected era. Even today, most of the developed western world strives to ancient Greeks’ democratic system. We also have an example of the USA. Three hundred years ago, a lot of people from different culture and nationality backgrounds came to live together on North American continent. In a relatively short amount of time, they built the powerful nation we know today. Although the people of the USA had some racial issues, over time they accepted the fact that everyone should be respected equally and have equal rights. Today, there are even more cultures mixed together in the USA.
However, there are people who will hate any newcomers to their country because of made up stereotypes and prejudices. They claim immigrants will bring crime and instability to their nation. To some extent I agree, but those problems are not unsolvable.Moreover, their nation will benefit much more in the long run.
Overall, I think mix of different cultures and traditions enrich peoples’ minds. We can see, on various examples, that it does help country’s growth. Furthermore, governments should emphasize on diversification and try to reduce existing hate between different types of communities in their states.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-27 | fowzan | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | pun chayaphol25 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | dacosta | 73 | view |
- In many countries today there are many highly qualified graduates without employment.What factors may have caused this situation and what, in your opinion, can/should be done about it? 56
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- People nowadays are used to disposable items meaning that they use things for short time and throw them away What do you think is the cause of this and what problems can it lead to 77
- Nowadays parents are sending their children on trips abroad for educational purposes. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 84
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 253, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
..., but those problems are not unsolvable.Moreover, their nation will benefit much more in...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t types of communities in their states.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5737704918 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1655122202 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5449817336 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4736842105 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0526315789 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.10526315789 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381266735986 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107739439218 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090269693985 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223574137321 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120111588739 0.056905535591 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.