Some people think that having people from different nationalities and cultural backgrounds living together in the same country makes the country develop faster. Do you agree?
Opinions are divided on whether immigrants lead to quicker progress of a host country. I totally agree that individuals from different nations and cultural backgrounds can make a country develop faster as they are likely to help to solve workforce and innovation issues that can compromise the progress of a nation.
Firstly, immigrants can help to overcome a lack of workforce in a host country. For instance, after the second world war, the UK relied on a massive number of immigrants to rebuild the country showing how important overseas workers were to recover the British economy in a record period. Also, the deep shortages of nurses that are currently seen in the same country have highlighted the necessity to recruit international qualified nurses to assure that the national health service continues to respond to the various challenges in the healthcare sector. The same applies to Germany, which is in urgent need for engineers and health professionals which are vital to the country's economy and human development. Therefore, it can be argued that without immigrants a significant number of countries would see their progress compromised.
Furthermore, having people from different cultures can lead to quicker innovation and consequently faster progress. Most nations tend to develop more in certain fields as a result of their culture and mindset. As a result, this fact is likely to benefit countries that receive multi-skilled international workers because these bring their ideas, expertise and experience and so there is no need to invest time and money to train for a skilled workforce. For example, the sense of leadership amongst the Chinese population has made this one of the most advanced societies in high-technology manufacturing. On the other hand, nations such as Denmark and Sweden have always shown concern about the environment and so they are leaders in the usage of green energy. Consequently, a nation that receives both nationals is likely to benefit in terms of technological and sustainable innovation in a much quicker way as the ideas and methods have already been developed.
In summary, I completely agree that people from different nationalities and cultural backgrounds living in the same country play an important role for a faster nation’s progress not only because they meet skill shortages but also because they bring ideas and techniques which are vital to innovation and progress.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-27 | fowzan | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | pun chayaphol25 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | dacosta | 73 | view |
- Local governments are pushing companies to move from large cities to regional locations. What are the benefits and drawbacks of this?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 73
- Some people believe that employees should stay in the same job for the rest of their lives Others think they should switch jobs at least once during their career To what extent do you agree disagree Partially agree with both views 58
- Both the poor and the rich find the accessibility into university difficult. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Economic progress is often used to measure a country's success. However, some people believe that other factors are more important. What other factors should also be considered when measuring a country's success? Do you think one factor is more 73
- In some countries, children under 16 years old are not allowed to leave school by law and get full-time work. Is this a good or bad thing? Discuss your opinion. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in summary, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2067.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34108527132 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98885215179 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529715762274 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 645.3 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.5125911466 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.642857143 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6428571429 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314157237361 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985698160386 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995059323266 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207409693107 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611679348381 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.