It is stated in the article that humpback whales may be navigating by the stars. The article also provides three reasons to support this opinion. However, the professor explains that navigation skills of humpback whales come from the natural instincts and inner magnetic indicators of these animals. His statements directly contradict each of the reasons pointed out in the reading passage.
First, the reading claims that humpback whales are intelligent animals and can use stars for navigation. But the professor disproves this point by saying that there aren’t any relationship between intelligence and animal’s ability to use stars for navigation. Because other animals such as ducks use stars to navigate but these animal not highly intelligent. He states that these animals in fact use their instinct to navigation.
Then, as the second reason, the article posits that humpback whales use stars to navigate in direct direction. Nevertheless , the professor draws attention to the point that humpback have biomagnetic in their brain. According to the professor, presence of biomagnetic in their brain suggest that they orient themselves by megnatic rather than stars.
At the end, as the third reason, the reading mentions that spy-hopping is applied for looking at the stars. But on the other hand, the lecture clearly refutes this point by explaining that spy-hopping has nothing to do with looking at stars. He illustrates his opinion by adding that other animals such as sharks do the same but sharks don’t migrate.
- Task 1 tpo 22 85
- The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 61
- TPO 49 Integrated Writing Task 85
- In order to be well informed a person must get information from many different news resources 60
- It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...vigate in direct direction. Nevertheless , the professor draws attention to the po...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, look, may, nevertheless, second, so, then, third, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40495867769 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76017897108 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0972255149 49.2860985944 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.4285714286 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2857142857 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33927083517 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122551927899 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795768563374 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195480987705 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288869228735 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.