Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities (e.g: environment, cost). Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Determining the most urgent priority for government spending has been high on agenda for decades. While many people appreciate issues like environment or cost, I opine that the authority should channel its budget into improving public transportation.
On the one hand, the importance of many priorities is considered to dominate that of state-run transport system because of several reasons. Firstly, although faster public means of transport is beneficial, surveys show that they bring about an inadequate outcome. For example, it was reported that despite a 10-percent in speed of light rail transport, its utilization did not obtain a proportional increase in New York, making the state’s project an unwise decision. By contrast, a spending for tackling other heated challenges like environmental degradation, or soaring crime rates can contribute to a comprehensive improvement, which is taken advantage by people on a nation scale. As an organ responsible for assuring social equality, it will be acceptable if the government prioritizes its expenditure on these issues.
On the other hand, I concur with the view that funding should be provided to upgrade public transport systems. From an economic perspective, there has been a consensus that faster vehicles may act as a catalyst in boosting domestic prosperity. Indeed, citizens and firms can take advantage from a reduced journey time, leading to a higher profit because of a lower overhead cost. In addition, allocating resources to public transport infrastructure, the authority is believed to adopt a multi-purpose policy, which resolves an excessive load of obstacles. Indeed, upgraded state-run vehicles are expected to discourage uses of private ones and, therefore, ease traffic flow. Not only does this help prevent traffic congestion but also reduces contamination of volatile organic compounds, the major cause of air pollution.
Briefly, while the impacts of other issues may be noticeable, it seems to me that a faster public transportation should be prioritized by states.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
| 2018-12-10 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects. What are the causes? And what will be the effects on society? 89
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The line graph shows the number of players in four different sports badminton tennis basketball rugby in a particular European country between 1985 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tation should be prioritized by states.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61022364217 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14285422648 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651757188498 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7924829614 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.428571429 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197419998665 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064275773387 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617494962682 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130353333963 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373044175097 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.