Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is argued that in these days, young-age people do not attend to help their societies sufficiently. In my opinion, I believe that today's young generations care community while they are trying their best, in particular in terms of technology and quality.
On the one hand, technology is, maybe, one of the most important values in developing societies. Technology is an improvement old to new which will be more efficient and effective from the old one. Thanks to technology, young age people know how to use it to penetrate subjects that are critical for the future of the community, yet older people think that there have not existed enough capacity help came from youngers. In addition, giving more time is less significant than working with a full capacity which means one great development creates huge help for society. For example, a college student, studies on software engineering, is working on a project to help to make transportation easier by using his own creative thinking skills mixing with technology, which means that this student made a big impression for all. There is no need for assuming that helping only comes from spending a lot of time. As a result, people who are young are able to manage their time nowadays and most of them work for the public.
In addition to technology, quality is another noteworthy reason. Quality is a degree of how good it is. Owing to quality, one wants to catch the maximum productive point. Therefore, currently, young people know what is quality means. So, sometimes it is not easy to reach the goal, but with a dramatic power of young brains will get them to that point. young people seem to be like they usually focus on wasteless actions. In contrast, I think, if they feel that their ideas enough qualified for helping communities, they immediately take action to accomplish them. With a perfect vision, young brains do not waste time, yet they only want to wait for the best moment in order to execute quality. In consequence, helping should be in the right time and the right place.
In a nutshell, when all the specific reasons and relevant examples are considered and evaluated, it can be concluded that at the present time, young people give time to helping their communities.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-29 | mucahit11 | 83 | view |
2020-01-26 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
2020-01-26 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
2020-01-24 | SSN775 | 76 | view |
2020-01-17 | naziii | 76 | view |
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specific to these online encyclopedias, 80
- Tpo 44Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are relate 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 80
- Do u agree or disagreeIn twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 354, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Young
...ung brains will get them to that point. young people seem to be like they usually foc...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in addition, in contrast, in particular, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8955613577 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65472469608 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563968668407 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1585113171 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6842105263 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1578947368 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275435783106 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810684068003 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072805989688 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191878426529 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587067965857 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.