The provided line graph illustrates the changes in the figure for british families using cars habitually between 1971 and 2007.
At first glance, all the proportions grew in this time period. In particular, the most remarkable rise belonged to the percentage of households owning two cars, which this number of families without car tended to dip.
It is noticeable that at the beginning, roughly half of british households did not use cars regularly. By contrast, the number of british families having 3 or more cars ranked the lowest, just under 2%.
Looking at the graph in more detail, the largest gap throughout this period went to households without cars, which decreased considerably by nearly 25%. Conversely, the rate of two-car families in Britain increased dramatically from around 8% to the same figure with families having no car. Also, the detail of one-car households seemed fluctuated minimally, but this number in 1971 was as large as in 2007, at about 35%.
- The graph below gives information about how much people in the United States and the United Kingdom spend on petrol Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 78
- Some Governments say how many children a family can have in their country should be strictly controlled They may control the number of children someone has through taxes Is It sometimes necessary and right for a government to control the population in thi 84
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 84
- Some Governments say how many children a family can have in their country should be strictly controlled They may control the number of children someone has through taxes Is It sometimes necessary and right for a government to control the population in thi 89
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, look, so, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10625 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71367342131 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0384981533 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.125 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198197872105 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856514605865 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686218265838 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122780300167 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777452129531 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, look, so, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10625 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71367342131 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0384981533 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.125 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198197872105 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856514605865 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686218265838 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122780300167 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777452129531 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.