The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares British people of five different ages for the years 1990 and 2010 in terms of the proportion of people who devoted their money to charity.
Overall, it is clear that a percentage of British people gave more money to charity in 1990 than they did in 2010. In addition, elder people donated more for charity than younger counterparts.
About over 15 percent of people aged from 18 to 25 years old in 1990 donated to charity, whereas around 17 percent of those in 2010. The proportion of people who was 50 years old and below spent more money for charity in 1990 than they did in 2010. The British aged 50 and younger in 1999 spent more money on charity than those in 2010. The percentage of people between 36 and 50 years of age in 1999 was the highest during this period, which accounted for above 40 percent. By contrast, the figure for the youngest people in 2010 was the lowest, at over 5 percent.
The proportion of British people after the age of 51 years old decreased slightly their donation to charity between 1999 and 2010. The percentage of people who was 51 and above in 1999 declined by under 5 percent (35 percent of the second oldest group and about 32 percent of the oldest age group). The figure for people in the 51-65 age group was exactly 35 percent in 1999, compared to over 30 percent of the 65 plus age group. The proportion for people between 51 years old and above in 1990 was lower than the figure for those in 2010.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries Why is this the case Is it a positive or negative development 73
- The charts below show the main methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table shows the percentage of literacy and employment in different countries in the 1990s and 2010s Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...re money on charity than those in 2010. The percentage of people between 36 and 50 ...
^^^
Line 4, column 297, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...out 32 percent of the oldest age group. The figure for people in the 51-65 age grou...
^^^
Line 4, column 428, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...er 30 percent of the 65 plus age group. The proportion for people between 51 years ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 33.7804878049 175% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 271.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41328413284 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20037615108 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.380073800738 0.547539520022 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.386418013 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26521814821 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140943111996 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581650865953 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208772137049 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367830570472 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.59 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.