The table shows the percentage of literacy and employment in different countries in the 1990s and 2010s.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table chart compares five different countries, namely USA, China, UK, Australia and India in terms of the proportion of literacy and employment between 1990 and 2010.
In general, there was a considerable increase in the percentage of literate people in different countries over the period shown. In addition, the proportion of employees in USA and India saw the most dramatic growth from 1990 to 2010.
The most dramatically rise in literate population was seen in China. The percentage of literacy in China was the lowest in the 1990s, at 42%, whereas the figure for China was over 90% in the 2010s. By contrast, USA witnessed the lowest rate of increase in literacy from 1990 to 2010 was only around 20%. The proportion of Australian who could read and write was the highest in the 2010s, which went up from 49% in the 1990s to 95% in the 2010s. UK and India were similar, which rose by around 30% during this period.
Throughout the period shown, the percentage of workers in USA, India and Australia experienced an upward trend, while the figure for China and UK saw a downward trend. Both the figure for employment in USA and India went up rapidly by 40% from 1990 to 2010 compare with the percentage of Australian workers increased minimally by 2% over the same period. The proportion for UK was the highest employment in the 1990s, which stood at almost 80%, after falling to 60% in the 2010s. The figure for Chinese employees declined slightly by about 5% over the period shown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-06 | nguyenphthao99@gmail.com | 92 | view |
- The table shows the percentage of literacy and employment in different countries in the 1990s and 2010s Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- The charts below show the main methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries Why is this the case Is it a positive or negative development 73
- It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than that of young people in many countries in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75769230769 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53104686342 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457692307692 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8272053726 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.083333333 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126958715138 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531582957071 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475970554861 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091124576731 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018819484124 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.