Some people think that we can use animals in any way for the benefits of human beings. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is no doubt that animals are a very important part of our ecosystem. Few people believe that it is natural to use animals for one’s own benefit, while others argue that it’s a form of abuse. In this essay, I will discuss points on both sides of the argument and provide my support to the former view.
From times immemorial, human beings have been depending on animals. There is no doubt that we derive great benefit from animal products like milk, medicines, nutritious food. Not only in terms of products, but also animals are widely used for transportation and agriculture. I think it is impossible to imagine our lives without the need to depend on animals. For instance, there is no true supplement for animal milk in terms of nutritional value and the same goes for drugs that use animal products. As mentioned earlier, they form an important part of our ecosystem, and to me our ecosystems are designed in a way living beings benefit from one another and co-exist in harmony. Now that we have looked into why it is impossible for us to imagine life without benefiting from animals, let’s now switch to the other side of our argument.
In contrast, there are few people who are of the opinion that humans should refrain from exploiting animals. In my view, that’s true to an extent, humans should not hunt or kill animals for pleasure; also they should not mistreat animals by creating a hostile living environment for them. These actions, in the long term will harm mankind, because these animals that are being killed for pleasure become extinct which will in turn result in unbalanced ecosystem that’s dangerous. It is important for humans to note that they cannot exist without deriving benefits from animals, and it is their responsibility to ensure animal welfare.
In conclusion, it is evident that humans cannot exist without deriving benefits from animals therefore I support the concept of depending on animals for our benefit, but as discussed earlier this needs to be carried out without subjecting animals to exploitation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-11 | abhishek1408 | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-10 | abhishek1408 | 56 | view |
- You rented a car from a company and while you were driving on holiday you had a small accident You will have to write a letter to the company and in your letter Explain when and from where you rented it Describe how the accident happened what kind of acti 78
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives 56
- On a recent holiday you lost a valueable item Fortunately you have travel insurance to cover the cost of lost item Write a letter to the manager of insurance company In your letter write about Describe the item you lost Explain how you lost it Tell the in
- You recently received a letter from a friend asking for advice about whether to go to college or to try to get a job You think he she should get a job Write a letter to this friend In your letter say why he she would not enjoy going to college explain why 73
- On a recent holiday you lost a valuable item Fortunately you have travel insurance to cover the cost of anything lost
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...rom times immemorial, human beings have been depending on animals. There is no doubt that we d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, therefore, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96253602305 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61612112248 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527377521614 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0842441463 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.8 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1333333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312291002025 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109394094819 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478971563701 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205834997035 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0107689371052 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.