scientist have been warning for many years already that in order to protect the environment people should use less energy however most people do not change their ways of living what is causing this behaviour how can people be encouraged to change
Over usage of energy resources at an alarming rate has always been a grave issue of concern since last several decades, especially ever since the globalisation came in limelight. Even after being warned by many scientist people are unable to cut down on it for myriad of reasons, elucidated in the upcoming segments along with plausible measures.
First and foremost reason that why people do not stop using natural resources is that they are in comfort zone. To be more precise, over dependency on such resources forces them to continue the utilisation. Submersibles, for example, is the easiest way to get water which is highly cost-effective even though people are not familiar with using hand pumps for the same reason. As such, being habitual of using energy resources people find it herculean task to mitigate the uses. Not only this but also availability and accessibility of such resources is one of the most prominent reasons of not reducing the uses. By this I mean individuals have easy approach towards petrol, diesel and electricity at every nook and corner that is too at cheap price. How, people utilise energy resources without thinking twice.
However, in order to persuade the people to use less energy, government can contribute a lot like by organising awareness campaigns, camps and seminars. In this case documentaries can also be helpful by which masses and classes can get awareness about the serious consequences of over using petroleum, liquid petroleum gas and so on. What is more, public transportation should be encouraged by facilitating in terms of cheaper fares, infrastructure, seats and comfort zone. In Singapore, for instance, uses of energy resources has been reduced ever since the improved version of transportation has introduced. Last but not least, the uses of solar panel should be e encouraged in terms of solar cooking, lights and so on which further may diminish the rising issues related to the electricity.
To recapitulate, I vehemently vouch that over dependency on energy resources can be hazardous for people as well as for coming generation in different aspects. Therefore, unanimous efforts are required to overcome the problem as soon as it is possible.
- The growth of online shopping will one day lead to all shops in towns and cities closing Do you agree or disagree 95
- some people believe that children s success in adulthood is related to the way they have been raised by their parents do you agree or disagree give your own opinion and examples 84
- Many people live in the outskirts when they go for holiday do you think it is good or bad? 84
- Plagiarism in academics has become a pressing problem in many countries today What are the causes of this problem What are some possible solutions 60
- most people accept that we live in a globalised world but not everyone agrees that is this is beneficial to what extent is globalisation of positive or negative development 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... resources without thinking twice. However, in order to persuade the people...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, as for, for example, for instance, i mean, as well as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18941504178 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92833052848 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58495821727 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3621884928 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.4375 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311813401899 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961292012291 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558692614441 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173481992059 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036663921696 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... resources without thinking twice. However, in order to persuade the people...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, as for, for example, for instance, i mean, as well as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18941504178 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92833052848 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58495821727 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3621884928 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.4375 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311813401899 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961292012291 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558692614441 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173481992059 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036663921696 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.