The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar graphs explicate the information about the graduate and post-graduate students who discarded to do full time jobs and performed different works like part-time work, voluntary work, further study and were unemployment in the UK in the year 2008. The data is calculated in the numbers of students.
Overall, in the UK total number of graduates were more as compared to the postgraduates; whereas, the most adapted destination of the UK students were further studies and lowest was in voluntary work. Also, part-time work was the second most preferred option taken by the graduates and postgraduates.
At the first glance, it can be clearly seen that 29,665 graduates and 2,725 postgraduates went for further studies, which was the maximum opted option by both, however the least number of the students were counted in voluntary work, which were 3500 and 345 respectively.
Further, the part time graduates were counted to be exactly 17,735, and the number of postgraduates was 2,535, which was also the second most chosen work. On the other hand, students who remained unemployed were 16,235 graduates and 1,625 postgraduates.
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people that universities should not teach arts subjects like philosophy and history and only after practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment Agree or dis 74
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what are the solution 84
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different ages and culture together To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...t-graduate students who discarded to do full time jobs and performed different works like...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... UK total number of graduates were more as compared to the postgraduates; whereas,...
^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the UK students were further studies and lowest was in voluntary work. Also, ...
^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ken by the graduates and postgraduates. At the first glance, it can be clearly s...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... and 345 respectively. Further, the part time graduates were counted to be exactly 17...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to work'
Suggestion: to work
..., which was also the second most chosen work. On the other hand, students who remain...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32786885246 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88022207099 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.4417111033 43.030603864 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.285714286 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176316600863 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906610998707 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629918056713 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125468029287 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05505025102 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.