The space travel is fantastic these days and people are very fascinated towards it, but there are many environmental problems in our planet that need to be resolved first. What is your opinion? Should money be spent on space travel or on environmental issues?
Recently, the phenomenon of fantastic space travels and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of environmental problems are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that spending money on environmental issues can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, resolving environmental problems can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of costly space travel, are visible. According to my own experience I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of fascinated people. Thus, beneficial ramifications of the better planet are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, space travels can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of spending money on space travel are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described negligible environmental issues. Hence, predicted outcomes of resolved problems are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of resolving environmental problems far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of space travel prove the significance of the planet, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-05 | Alireza.r.m | 80 | view |
| 2020-02-28 | Alireza.r.m | 86 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | Mpaul | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | hemsingh81 | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-12 | mojtaba1980 | 80 | view |
- Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books Agree or disagree 88
- Should there be a wage cap for highly paid people Is it good or bad 73
- Globalization is important What is your opinion Give your reasons 93
- Soon retirement of workers can create job opportunities for young people discuss Give examples 88
- For a successful company selling products depends more on the company s reputation or it depends more on if they provide a discount and free offers To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76211453744 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24352351588 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63436123348 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5708858835 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.909090909 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329901143404 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10337000121 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501949291437 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185749186347 0.151781067708 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353058097718 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.