The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006.
The line chart illustrates the amount of oil produced and consumed every day in China from 1982 to 2006.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that the demand was more than providing. Additionally, China witnessed an increase in both the production and consumption of oil over the period shown.
In 1982, the number of petroleum manufactured in China met enough about the needs of the people living here, with about 2 million for both. Over the next eight years, the rate of oil using rose slightly to approximately 2 million, while the oil generation increased significantly per day to 3 million barrels in 1986 and then remained constant until 1990.
However, a reversal occurred at the rest of the phase. Since 1990 onwards, the quantity of oil made experienced a trivial rise at roughly 3.5 million casks in 2006. Meanwhile, in the same time period, the amount of oil Chinese people use soared like a rocket, up to just over 6 million barrels.
- The tables give information about the average hour s work by part time and full time men and women in three countries in Europe in 2002 and compare them with the European countries 84
- The bar chart shows the distribution of employment among agriculture services industries in three countries in 1980 and projected distribution in 2020 84
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of plastics 78
- In many countries more and more young people are leaving school but unable to find jobs What problems do you think youth unemployment causes for individuals and the society What measures should be taken to reduce the level of unemployment among youngsters 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8303030303 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70912480489 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660606060606 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7407133001 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.625 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243728282415 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099016970981 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860801551986 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157828376911 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781328711279 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.