Fossil fuels such as coal or oil are main sources of energy in many countries. However, in some countries, the use of renewable source of energy such as solar and wind energy are encouraged. Is it positive or negative?
These days, fossil fuels are the predominant sources of energy in several countries across the world despite having dire repercussions on the wellbeing of the environment. Hence, it is recommended that renewable sources of energy be used to spur environmental harmony. In my opinion, it is an auspicious development as using renewable sources as a major supply of energy could abate the consequences stemming from using fossil fuels.
Firstly, natural energy sources, such as solar, water, and wind, are abundant in nature, whereas the sources of fossil fuels are non-renewable and difficult to replenish once they get exhausted. Moreover, because of their converting process to generate energy, follis fuels emit a hefty amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, which has detrimental impacts on the environment. Secondly, renewable sources of energy are conducive to the environment and have no adverse impacts on maintaining the ecological balance of the environment. In other words, should we radically transform toward using renewable energy instead of fossil fuels, we can negate the risk of mounting global temperature.
Another imperative for preferring renewable energy over fossil fuels is that by using natural energy sources, especially in the major industrial endeavors, companies can be sustainable and achieve economies of scale in the long-run. Because renewable energy entails lower operational costs, it is much more bankable than using fossil fuels. A recent study, for instance, depicted that the RMG sector in Bangladesh benefitted from using solar energy in its daily operation, which has moderated the electricity bills of the companies operating under this sector.
In conclusion, there are a number of other plausible reasons to prefer using renewable sources to meet the demand for our energy needs. It will not only safeguard the world environment but also be a cost-effective solution, especially for developing nations.
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The grap bellow shows the sales of children s books adult fiction and educational books between 2002 to 2006 in a county Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 55
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can government do to reduce the amount of rubbish produced Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 61
- All criminals should have access to get education and rehabilitation wile ij prison To what extent do you agree or disagree 71
- Many countries spend a lot of money on art Some people think investment in art is necessary but others say the money is better spent on improving health and education Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57575757576 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98148480856 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9655233364 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6666666667 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417578462102 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159136798823 0.084324248473 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817101875224 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248073128792 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846227706806 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.