Nowadays, children or teenagers favor enjoying passionately in online games on the computer over doing physical exercise on a regular basis. This is virtually due to many entertainment intentions. This essay will first make a plausible explanation for this harmful issue, and then give some relevant examples.
First of all, there is no room for doubt that children are spending most of their spare time on playing computer games, especially online games. And this phenomenon mostly comes from the purpose of entertainment. Many online games provide players with attractive graphics designs, and therefore, stimulates them to deeply hook on those games. Furthermore, this also results from their curiosities about surroundings, especially the Internet which has been popular among children recently, and thus they are spending a great deal of time on games. For example, it is reported from the Vietnamese government that teenagers spend roughly 10 hours per day to take part in online games.
There are many assumptions show that this issue greatly affects badly to the development of a child. This is because due to the long-term period of playing computer games, children are leading to an unhealthy sedentary lifestyle. More specifically, having their eyes focusing too much on the computer screens may result in eye-sighted, as well as suffer from many bodily discomforts such as severe headaches or intense back pains. Consequently, this exerts detrimental damages to their physical and mental health. To reduce the risk of health depression, some game developers instantly come up with the idea of combining physical activities like sports in games to encourage the young generation avoid unhealthy lifestyles.
In conclusion, being highly exposed to computer games causes severe health problems to children these days due to the attraction of many colorful designed games on the Internet
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 67
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 78
- The chart shows the percentage of car manufacturer’s total car sales in different regions from 2006 to 2010. 78
- The bar chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45762711864 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84498682147 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616949152542 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6417862377 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200336457335 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645982141548 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560529892181 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126179823461 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455278577522 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.