The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
A musician can be popular and not enough to be assessed as talented. there is a firm distinction between fame and talent that leads an artist to wait for several generations if not death to be assessed as talented accurately. fame may hinder the actual assessment as popularity may overshadow talent.
Firstly, being accepted by the new generation which is basically known as popularity has nothing to do with being assessed as talented. every new generation seeks new style and composition to break the boredom of entertainment. Following the trend, a lot of innovations and fusions are made to feed the tempt of the new generation. Sometimes these yet to flourish bands and musicians attract huge attention and earn name and fame which assesses them as famous apparently. Weather they are actually a talent or not is yet to be assessed as it could be momentary or semi permanent.
Secondly, a lot of talented artists are there who are not popular as they fail to grab the attention or simply unfortunate to be exposed. In literary, there are many examples where the writer’s most famous creation was exposed after his death. may be his writing could not appeal the contemporaries but attracted the future generation. Same goes for music as both are the two major but different forms of art. For example, Michael Jackson was popular in his entire life for his compositions and dance. yet he was considered as a legend only after his death as it is the next generations who are still seeking his works. An artist becomes a legend when the future generation is considering his works despite being availed by the new generation’s work.
Finally, fame is temporary where class is permanent. classical music is adored by every generation no matter what age group it is. A music could be considered classic only after a definite period when it is no longer considered as a creation of a certain generation. Honest assessment is done when there is no possibility of considering the current popularity a musician is having.
In conclusion, an artist could be famous and talented in his living period and the assessment could be real but until it is appreciated by the next generations equally, it could not be considered as assessed properly. it is very likely that a musician would not see the real assessment in his life as it is possible only after being assessed by several generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | Gbangbala Usman | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Gnyana | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Jbrachael | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Ataraxia-m | 62 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Ataraxia-m | 50 | view |
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities 66
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 54
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
- 4days workweek 3
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... not enough to be assessed as talented. there is a firm distinction between fame and ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Fame
... to be assessed as talented accurately. fame may hinder the actual assessment as pop...
^^^^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Every
... to do with being assessed as talented. every new generation seeks new style and comp...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nnovations and fusions are made to feed the tempt of the new generation. Sometimes these ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: May
...s creation was exposed after his death. may be his writing could not appeal the con...
^^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e future generation. Same goes for music as both are the two major but different ...
^^
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Yet
...re life for his compositions and dance. yet he was considered as a legend only afte...
^^^
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Classical
... is temporary where class is permanent. classical music is adored by every generation no ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 219, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...not be considered as assessed properly. it is very likely that a musician would no...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, apparently, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 41.0 19.5258426966 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1995.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90171990172 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89018275768 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459459459459 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 653.4 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5950444584 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.380952381 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52380952381 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391997388153 0.243740707755 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122441630641 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919610750058 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245594913363 0.150359130593 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972741918698 0.0667264976115 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.