Cycling is the healthier and more environmentally friendly form of transportation. Nevertheless, cycling is getting less popular. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to make cycling more popular?
In recent years, there has been a downward trend towards the popularity of cycling in spite of its significant benefits to not only human health but also environment. Although this problem can be attributed to a whole host of reasons, some feasible solution can be considered to adress this.
There are two main compelling factors that could be explanations for this trend. Firstly, due to the time-consuming nature of cycling, it is less preferred. This is because city dwellers who are required to rush to school or work in such bustling area will opt time-saving transportation such as automobiles in order to minimize their commuting time. Secondly, since urban streets usually have high traffic volume, it is hazardous for people to circulate. In fact, especially in rush hours, if cyclists weave between cars and vehicles, they pose a threat to the safety of themselves and other commuters.
However, this problem could be tackled by concerted efforts made by both individuals and authorities. First, it is imperative to raise public awareness about the health and environmental benefits that cycling bestows them. This means that residents will gain more motivation to travel by bike. Additionally, the governmental bodies should construct designated bike routes and lands with the purpose of creating favourable conditions for cycling, therefore, generate behaviour change. For example, in the Netherlands, with a sizable investment in infrastructure for cyclists, thus, has succeeded in making bike riding a mainstream activity and fostering a national biking culture from generation to generation.
In conclusion, there is a myriad of reasons why the preference for cycling is likely to decline, yet it could be resolved with the involvement of both citizens and the public sector.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-22 | layla23012003 | 84 | view |
- Cycling is the healthier and more environmentally friendly form of transportation Nevertheless cycling is getting less popular What are the reasons for this What can be done to make cycling more popular 84
- Some people say that the best way to improve road safety would be to increase minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- For many employers formal academic qualifications are becoming more important than experience Why is that Is it a positive or negative development 89
- In many cities today most people live in large apartment blocks Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages 84
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private company To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40925266904 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04020833689 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661921708185 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.811314044 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.923076923 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9230769231 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237712195111 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695075614891 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464573073282 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134443916957 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473639854571 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40925266904 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04020833689 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661921708185 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.811314044 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.923076923 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9230769231 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237712195111 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695075614891 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464573073282 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134443916957 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473639854571 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.