Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field as long as they are playing well

Essay topics:

Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field, as long as they are playing well.

Although most professional athletes are aware of their position as role models for their fans and behave accordingly, there are sportsmen and sportswomen who behave poorly during matches and in their private life. While some people find it acceptable as long as their performance on the field is not impacted, not everyone agrees with that point of view.

Those who put athletes’ performance on the field above everything else point out that competitive environment and immense pressure the sports people are under affect their behavior. They argue that athletes are entitled to privacy and their actions before and after games should not concern the general public. I find this hard to agree with, because poor behavior in sports people is incompatible with their role in public’s life and also for the reason that their actions could negatively affect their entire sports industry.

The main reason why I believe athletes should behave well at all times is that their behavior is tremendously influential. Spectators respect players and many copy their actions and behavior; therefore, if top players misbehave or violate laws, some of the fans may feel compelled to follow their example and behave badly. For example, after an acclaimed baseball player was caught using drugs some years ago, the number of people who were arrested for the same crime significantly increased. This shows quite clearly why high profile players should consider their actions very carefully in order to promote a peaceful society.

In addition, the behavior of athletes might affect the popularity of their sports. Some companies sponsor successful athletes who boost their brand recognition and sales of their products. Players and sports industry executives are financially compensated for endorsing products and participating in commercial advertisements. If they demonstrate poor behavior, sponsors could direct their money elsewhere, and as a result sports matches could suffer due to lack of funds. To illustrate, Sumo, a traditional Japanese sport, is held every season thanks to resources donated by companies. In a year when a Sumo player was involved in a violent crime, no matches were held, resulting in a large deficit of funds.

In conclusion, I completely disagree with the opinion that top athletes are permitted to behave badly because their behavior may negatively influence the public behavior and sports industry itself.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-11-14 eyraen 78 view
2020-10-30 sharmaisha 61 view
2020-10-30 sharmaisha 61 view
2020-09-16 Rishiraj Kansara 89 view
2020-04-24 Justin 84 view
Essays by user selenophile :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... and after games should not concern the general public. I find this hard to agree with, becaus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 155, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun copy seems to be countable; consider using: 'many copies'.
Suggestion: many copies
...uential. Spectators respect players and many copy their actions and behavior; therefore, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 246, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... top players misbehave or violate laws, some of the fans may feel compelled to follow their...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2073.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45526315789 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73437515334 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568421052632 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7413021144 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5625 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124509350787 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440510879863 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442293983663 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0753248905218 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585415768371 0.056905535591 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.