Some people say it is a waste of time when people plan for future. It is more important to focus on the present. Do you agree or disagree?
It is generally argued that organizing tasks for the fore-coming period is an inefficient utilization of time while the present should be seized. While I agree that present should be efficiently spent, future should be kept in view simultaneously.
Undoubtedly, making plans is a time-consuming task and one should enjoy the present situations to the fullest without worrying about the uncertain times ahead. Additionally, plans become futile in events of contingencies and the time spent on their preparation seems to be wasted. Moreover, by being focused in the current period, one can stay productive and derive the maximum benefit from the given circumstances. Unnecessary pondering over the future leads to skip the important events of the present which may result in undesirable outcomes. It is surveyed by health experts that people who remain anxious about future often suffer from depression.
However, one should not remain so engrossed in present that he forgets about the upcoming situations. Drafting a plan for future is a crucial task and has numerous advantages. Predominantly, by writing down the goals one remains highly motivated to accomplish the same. Along with that, people can have a clear vision of how to achieve their targets and hence remain enthusiastic. Further, plans can be edited according to the changing situations and work can be carried out efficiently. For instance, when a student falls sick, he can allot his leisure time for covering that pending work.
Conclusively, seizing the present is important, a combination of having thought about the near future and relishing the present would certainly lead to a delightful and successful life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-08 | ashmita tinna | 78 | view |
- Climate change is an urgent issue and it is believed that the utilization of fossil fuels should be stopped and alternative energy resources should be used instead It is however believed that oil gas and coal are indispensable What is your opinion Support 67
- Some people think studying in groups is better while some think self study is better for school students Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- Some people say it is a waste of time when people plan for future It is more important to focus on the present Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people say that it is a waste of time to plan for future It is more important to focus on present Do you agree or disagree 56
- The graphs show percentage of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37735849057 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99734307408 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611320754717 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.164965935 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.785714286 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232130982882 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758022354939 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391566924252 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131106352426 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381661291128 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.