The internet is a great course of information and has opened up opportunities for people to learn all over the world. Is all information reliable on the internet? What could be done to control information online?
The internet has revolutionized people learning means and provide them with an unprecedented opportunity to learn despite their current location. This new-emerged phenomenon is the fastest way to share any kind of information. However, this feature could not be considering all beneficial as there are many misleading and unreliable information among. This issue and ways of mitigating wrong information sharing will be discussed here.
The internet considered as an interactive way of communication where all people could spread their thought and beliefs. Indeed, every individual would be able to share information no matter they are right or have been made in their own mind. Provided that there is no monitoring on the information shared in this media, the rate of accuracy would be highly low. A good example for this would be sharing misleading information about the USA election in 2016 which result in Trump's election when some intelligence agencies outside the country shared misleading information about his achievement and shaped people's mind to vote for him. The issue has caused many controversies over his presidential.
Nevertheless, there are some possible solutions which might help to alleviate the issue. Firstly, people should be thought to check information they gain from different sources such as different websites, TVs, radios, newspapers and so on. Secondly, source creditability must be announced from trustable organizations to guide people obtain their information from creditable sources. Last but not the least, a new trend that have been shaped among casual people is that they rely on social media channels and pages to gain information. In this regard, these social media are in charge of controlling and monitoring the information that are getting viral and stop them from deviating the society beliefs and information. In result, a set of activities from both authorities and people must be conducted to avoid misinformation in the internet environment.
All in All, although there are many reasons behind sharing unreliable information on the internet ranging from people lack of knowledge how to check the information and some agencies conspiracies, there are some possible solution for that like teaching people and controlling massive information sharing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-08 | mrezabarfi | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-19 | daalex | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | Chinthaka | 42 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Diya si | 93 | view |
| 2019-05-02 | Megha Gupta | 67 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
- Schools are spending more time teaching traditional subjects such as history. Some people think they should rather spend more time in teaching skills that can help students find a job.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 61
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide.What is the cause of this?What measures can the international community take to make sure the supply of food is enough? 73
- Some people believe that playing a musical instrument can be beneficial in many different ways. Others think it is a waste of time to play a musical instrument. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- Teenagers should not be allowed to use mobile phones at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 613, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind voting'.
Suggestion: mind voting
...bout his achievement and shaped peoples mind to vote for him. The issue has caused many cont...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52974504249 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.030647808 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546742209632 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8726080559 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349753865139 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110936507733 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806935906943 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241386736186 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625719886314 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.