Nowadays, we can watch entertainment performance from the screen (laptop etc. ) and no need to watch it live. To what extent do you agree or disagree
In today's globalized, urbanised and the over-populated world more and more individuals are watching funny shows and dramas on TV or computer in order to getting entertainment for their personal life. Some people believe that this trend is rising especially in Asian countries. I partially agree with the idea and in this essay I provide some contentious argument in favour to support an overall opinion.
From an overall perspective, perhaps the most compelling reason why masses are watching programs on laptops or TV screens is because it is a cheepest source to collect more entertainment. This means that If they go to the concert they would spend more money on it. For example, A recent research concluded that 65% of international students who watched TV every day after completed their work. A further point in favour of this idea could be that watching performance on screen is a better way to saving the time. Unless they save their time, they will feel lonely, isolated and alienated which in turn leads to personal problems like as depression and alcoholism.
On the flip side, there are several arguments against that Firstly, If they do not watch live shows they would not meet their favorite artists. The result of this phenomenon might be that they will not compete their desire dreams. The decision as to whether we should attend live concerts in order to collect more entertainment must be seen in the context of the entire society.
To sum up, Although, this is a topic which is very relevant to contemporary society. I believe quite strongly that watching programs on screen is a cheepest and time saving way for getting entertainment. If less people watch live shows, it would be more desirable for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-13 | Ahsanjamil | 73 | view |
- Advertising discourages us from being different individuals by making us all want to be and to look the same 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3spreads from 1981 to 2007. 67
- The number of people getting higher who wearing fashionable clothes It is a good or bad situation 73
- Some people feel that learning new languages can help you however others believe that it is a waste of time and energy as we have advanced technology for language translation 73
- Studies suggest children now watch more television than they did in the past and spend less time doing active or creative things Why do you think this case what measure could taken solution 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 245, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...mpete their desire dreams. The decision as to whether we should attend live concerts in order...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 208, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...aving way for getting entertainment. If less people watch live shows, it would be mo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, as to, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98625429553 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73454458446 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567010309278 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5167234038 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.642857143 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171393790437 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589763586449 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513327987286 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106168506305 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240601529178 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.