It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent years, there has been a growing trend towards exploring remote natural areas for a variety of purposes. Although this trend is not without advantages, the upside will justify these.
It is undeniable that this trend has some certain drawbacks. First, since remote areas have severe weather and a large number of wild animals, thrill-seekers can put themselves in jeopardy by visiting these destinations. For instance, the average temperature at the South Pole is -25.9 Celsius, which can leave tourists at stake because none of them are familiar with this harsh condition. Second, by traveling to untouched areas, people can inadvertently damage the eco-system because of the inadequacy in awareness of these places. This means that these areas can lose their inherently natural beauty due to perilous experiments or activities such as improperly littering or adversely physically affecting, leading to environmental degradation.
Nevertheless, under no circumstances should the benefits of this trend be marginalized. First, with the view of protecting the environment and fully understanding the effects of humans on the Earth, on-site research is imperative. In fact, if the pertinent data about the life of wild animals and residents in remote natural areas, such as the melting ice leading to the deficient inland, was not collected with vivid videos, the public would not aware of their harmful habits, thereby raising their awareness on protecting the environment. Another benefit is that isolated natural areas offer one-of-a-kind traveling experience to visitors. For example, those who take a vacation to the South Pole will be able to immerse themselves in the wilderness and the atmosphere that are entirely different from the world they know, which helps develop their high appreciation for nature.
In conclusion, although traveling to remote areas contains some concerns, humans and the world can reap benefits from it in numerous ways. As long as there is no disruption to the original state of nature, people should be galvanized to visit these destinations.
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The technology development has affected social relationships from person to person Do the positive aspects of this trend outweigh the negative aspects 89
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Prison is the common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime However a more effective solution is to provide people a better education DO you agree or disagree 84
- Sending criminals into prisons is the best way to reduce the rate of crime in society Do u agree or not 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 111, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ce remote areas have severe weather and a large number of wild animals, thrill-seekers can put th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, second, so, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4537037037 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96240188875 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586419753086 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1692067637 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.214285714 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153954265159 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470056353084 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384327892304 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088866581283 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302435196227 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 111, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ce remote areas have severe weather and a large number of wild animals, thrill-seekers can put th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, second, so, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4537037037 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96240188875 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586419753086 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1692067637 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.214285714 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153954265159 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470056353084 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384327892304 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088866581283 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302435196227 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.