The line graph illustrates the amount of 4 kinds of meat which were consumed in a European country for over 25 years from 1979 to 2004.
The consumption of chicken showed a significant rise over the period, while the amount of Beef and Lamb were consumed experienced a downward trend. Fish demanding remained steady after a small drop at the beginning of the period.
In 1975 the consumption of chicken was nearly 150 grams per person per week. It’s rate increased significantly and reaching almost 250 grams at the end of the period which was the highest among these four types of meat. In the meantime, the consumption of fish experienced a small declined of about 10 grams in the first year and then remained stable over the period. It also had the lowest rate at the end of the period.
In early 1979, the consumption of beef and lamp which were nearly 200 and 100 grams per person per week decreased substantially, although there was some fluctuation in these trends. The amount of beef started increasing in 1982 but it rose and fall for about 7 years then went down and reached 105 grams in 2004, while the amount of lamb consumption just experienced a decline compared to its first year.
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- People in community now could buy cheaper consumer goods Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 67
- Some people think that large impressive buildings are important for city Others believe that the money should be spent on improving schools and hospitals Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66509433962 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57256297837 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6420505504 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.888888889 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205128142832 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842419161236 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12250566891 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156518892721 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154063712229 0.0819641961636 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.