Chevalier
The reading and the lecturer are both about Chevalier de singlet's memoir. The author of the reading feels that he is not happy with the pieces of evidence he received. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He is of the opinion, that the source of evidence was accurate.
To begin with, the author feels that Chevalier has borrowed money from the Swiss merchant despite he was rich. The article mentions that the Chevalier was wealthy by spending his money on parties and gambling. This particular argument was challenged by the lecturer. She says that if Chevalier borrowed money from the Swiss merchant it does not mean he was poor. Additionally, she mentions that when the Chevalier ran out of money, he sold one of his properties. So, for the time being, he borrowed money from the merchant.
Secondly, the article mentions that there was no accuracy in the memoir recordings. The author says that since the recording was done by referring the memo many years ago, it might be not a valid one. However, the lecturer says that the Chevalier took a memo of his friend and his conversations each night. In addition to that, the lecturer says that Chevalier was updating that memo on a daily basis. So there will not any doubt that the recordings are not accurate.
Finally, the author mentions that Chevalier escaped from prison by using bribery. The article posits this by mentioning that Chevalier had well-connected friends in Venice who might have helped him to escape from prison. The lecturer disputes this by saying even more powerful contacts were thereby many prisoners. He escaped from the prison, the way he mentioned in the memoir.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 76 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | 200suranjan | 60 | view |
| 2023-05-17 | Haleh Rezazadeh | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | joyce05 | 3 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | theprasad | 70 | view |
- Sea otters small mammals 73
- Sustaining human on Venus
- It is important for students to learn concepts and ideas rather than facts Do you agree or disagree with the following statement 60
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement My lifestyle is easier and more comfortable than the one my grandparents experienced when they were young Use specific details and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ith the pieces of evidence he received. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90106007067 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53620169645 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498233215548 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.2399406125 49.2860985944 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.0 110.228320801 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8947368421 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265892622346 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101307267777 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108411003742 0.0662205650399 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169754974351 0.162205337803 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470507255591 0.0443174109184 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.3589403974 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.