negative aspects of playing computer games between young children
No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of playing computer games between young children. But it is my firm belief that spends time with video games between kids is a waste of time and has a wide disadvantage for them.
For a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
My primary reason is that kids should not be allowed to play computer games because these games maybe ruin the ability of children for being creative with an active brain. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by study at the Torento university. According to study on children between ages 3 to 7, computer games have a harmful effect on their brain. In this study, MRI imaging of the kid' s brain shows that some parts of their brain with responsibility for creative think and logical skills were much less active in contrast with other parts. As a result, computer games take the chance of mind' s development between kids.
Secondly, children that spend most of their time in front of video games without any particular activity or sports are more susceptible to different illness. In my view, children must spend their time in outside of home and using fresh air to their lungs. Kids must be jumping, dancing, and do some activities over and over instead of just sitting down and gazing on screen. Moreover, these games make problems due to weight gain in their childhood time.
In light of the above mentioned, I strongly believe that children should not be allowed to play with them. Not only because of it' s negative impact on the children' s mental health but also it's harmful impact on the health of their body.
- reject the advantage of storing information about patients in electronic databases by speaker 70
- Problems with writer s explanations for mass extinction at the end of the Triassic period 60
- fuel cell engines 83
- The reading passage claims that there are several possible causes for the little ice age such as Gulf Stream volcanic eruption and indirect human activities However the professor in the lecture casts doubts on the points made in the reading 70
- problems with farming tuna fish 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 299.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71571906355 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40589370409 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555183946488 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6687924478 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.714285714 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35301938277 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12983505927 0.076458572812 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162516866233 0.0737576698707 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185108557209 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159507763255 0.0645574589148 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.