Some people say that what children watch on TV influences their behaviour while others say the amount of time children they spend watching Tv influences their behaviour. Discuss both views and give your opinion
Some people suggest that how much time children spend watching television does not affect their behaviour, but rather the content of what they watch, while others disagree. Personally, I think that both of these factors have an impact on a child's behaviour and this essay will discuss bad influences that both bring.
It is clear that preschoolers are unable to distinguish between the right and the wrong, so it is not difficult to understand when they easily access inappropriate contents that have been allowed to be televised. In other words, TV programmes and commercials these days are full of graphic violence, sex scenes and sexual connotations. These things cause some mental impairments, misconception and inappropriate behaviours in preschoolers. In addition, children have the tendency to imitate what is depicted on the screen, paired with the lack of parents' timely guidance and frequent observation. Violence in movies, for example, shows children poor examples of manner, increase their crime rate in the future.
On the other hand, keeping kids glued to the television screen all day has a negative effect on their thinking and behaviour. TV programs are incapable of forming children's perception without their repetition, there is an idiom sentence" Rome was not built in a day", the influence of TV on children is a gradual and continuous process. As a result, the more children watch TV, the more significant the effect is on their personality and behaviours. Furthermore, serious different issues will also happen when they pay too much attention to TV shows. Firstly, the reduction in interaction with family members and the outside world. Secondly, children may be isolated due to insufficient participation in outdoor activities, that are reasons leading to unconfidence in children or even the risk of autism.
In conclusion, I believe that both what children watch and the amount of time they use to face the TV screen can harm their behaviours. To help children comprehensively develop both behaviorally and mentally, parents should choose the appropriate programs, limit TV time and encourage their kids to join in physical activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-09 | hueyy | 67 | view |
| 2021-04-27 | dhruv j patel | 61 | view |
| 2021-04-27 | dhruv j patel | 56 | view |
| 2020-05-03 | thenaolayeu112 | 89 | view |
| 2020-02-29 | Dung132 | 78 | view |
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss 2 views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations Others think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed Discuss these views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people think a job not only provides income but also social life Others think it is better to develop social life with people you do not work with Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people say that what children watch on TV influences their behaviour while others say the amount of time children they spend watching Tv influences their behaviour Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ldren watch and the amount of time they use to face the TV screen can harm their be...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36443148688 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03707537063 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606413994169 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7798425151 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.666666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465682241869 0.244688304435 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135105916761 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106667534125 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288229352721 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915360255021 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.