More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
There are some reasons why parents think their children can learning technology skills through accepting to spent time on computers and tablets. This problem will have some benefits, but it brings negative to their children.
On the one hand, there are several advantages for children playing on computers and tablets in nowaday. One reason is that children will learn news knowledge supporting their lessons in the school, as learning many lessons distancing from the internet. For example, children get to find information details about even history using a computer or tabler for supplying their lessons about history in class. As result, this skill will not only help their children solve problem in their life but also develop knowledge in the future. Second, they can learn about the skills of technology for their career after graduating from school. This skill is very important for the jobs in development technology today such as learning skills for using Microsoft word for work in the future. The skills will contribute to their children in the present and in the future for their life and studying.
On the other hand, using computers and tablets bring some drawback for children. First, the children spend a lot of time on the screen to affect health for them. This problem in health for both mental and physical. One illustrates for this problem is their children will myopic, ability increase in the future depends on time using computers or tablets. Second, they will depend on computers or tablets. Many children use too much time on computers or tables for studying. For instance, the children use excel to calculate in the math in school leading to the children will do not understand about knowledge of the lesson. This way will affect the thinking and development of children in the future.
In conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for and against the parents permit their children to use computers and tablets for studying technology skills, but I believe that it is balancing time on screens and other activities and the parents need control time for using computers and tablets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | susannora | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | Pham Van Nhan | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-27 | Phuong Tran | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | rachell | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-17 | Linhdung | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010
- The diagrams below shows the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010 67
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08620689655 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49386881942 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.42816091954 0.561755894193 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9841247339 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337426628474 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144959914878 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583745598947 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242738189631 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553461290371 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.