More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas. Do you think it is negative or positive development?
In the modern day, the trend of settling in modest accommodations or no out spaces has become popular in various megacities. Although this kind of living area has some advantages, it still has numerous downsides.
On the one hand, there is a wide range of benefits from living in modest spaces. Firstly, it is undeniable that homeowners who settle their lives in a small house are able to not only less busy with such housework as cleaning or maintaining furniture but also having a significant amount of time for leisure activities. This is because those people possess a simple lifestyle. Secondly, there is a fact that living-conditions in many developing cities have increased significantly playing enormous impacts on either young generations or the poverty-stricken. Because of the appearance of modest apartments, it would be a feasible measure to offer an inexpensive rental cost for both the less fortunate and the low-income labor.
On the other hand, many architecture types of small houses bring about broad-based drawbacks for either rental customers or residents. In fact, in terms of nuclear families or multi-generation ones, it is obvious that a lack of privacy is inherently unavoidable. As a result, working members or youngsters at the school-age can be disturbed in their rest time and study, leading to a fall in academic achievements or productivity at work. In addition, by having one’s lives in confined areas, residents are more likely to suffer from a negative state of mind. For example, confined areas are extremely unhealthy for senior people who confront daily stress, which can cause depression and easy conflict between family members.
In conclusion, living in small apartments is fraught with pitfalls, and residents should take settling their lives in confined areas into consideration
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-25 | Friezzy | 89 | view |
| 2020-05-07 | nghialeminh | 89 | view |
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Other believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Present both views and give y 78
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 78
- In developing countries children in rural communities have less access to education Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and Inte 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at leas 67
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant e 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30689655172 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12960053751 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634482758621 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6401305224 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.384615385 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4615384615 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18862992001 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578288230521 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465867942666 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111942722539 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232852267067 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.