Some business find that their new employees lack in basic interpersonal skills such as the lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team. What are the causes and suggest possible solutions. Aslo provide relevant examples from your experience.
Exploring fresh workers has been incapable of working together in a team in certain strata of jobs for the past few years. This essay will not only intend the factors associated with this issue but also enumerate some potential measures to mitigate it.
Two glaring causes of those new employees who are unwilling to cooperate with their colleagues are enumerated following. Since in the fast paced competitive era, an effective communication skill presents someone's talent, owing to the scarcity of better converse fresh staff somewhere unable to work jointly. Another reason behind this deleterious situation, a recruiter cannot collaborate with his friends during job unless the person has profound knowledge regarding his particular role in work. What is more, due to the devoid of proper knowledge often ample obstacles are confronted by new workers for instance, loss self esteem and phobia.
Despite the above mentioned striking factors, the imperative remedial actions should be taken to alleviate the problem. First of all, before selecting in a business a selector should be well- trained about job and personalted. To cite an example, myriad people have been hired for job after passing face to face interview where his attributes are jugded by employer, whether he is rudimentary familiar about job or not. Secondly, in terms of working in a team, a new employee ought to be opted on behalf of his good communication skills. So, definitely, in this respect, an employee would be willing to participate in a group discussion if he is a good translator.
To compendium, this disturbing problem has risen to umpteen factors that are highlighted in this easy and numerous steps can be taken to ameliorate this issue.
- An increasing number of people change their career and place of residence several times during their lifetime Is this a positive or negative development 57
- The diagrmas below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 100
- The maps below shows the changes made in an Australian park in 2015 and now 61
- The diagram shows the recycling of aluminium cans 40
- An increasing number of people change their career and place of residence several times during their lifetime Is this a positive or negative development 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, first of all, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1935483871 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80918994656 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670250896057 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7391436774 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.75 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118828219143 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455666601143 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476854237738 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0633804995251 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474865074961 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.