Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
It is generally claimed that governments should place few limitation on scientific research and development. I am agree with the statement because of the reasons which are elucidated below.
First of all, scientific researches are very expensive works which require financial support from the governments. These researches have long term benefits to the governments and society. So governments can make a good investment on the scientific researches and with fewer restrictions and more supporting they can gain profit. For example, research developments in agriculture have positive consequences for the society. Governments maybe impose some restriction on these researches like genetic modification and increasing crops yielding which are very sensitive issues but if the governments trust the researches, they can bring sustainability to the society and benefit country.
Moreover, placing restriction on scientific development have bad consequences in log term span. It can cause the migration of the researchers of a country due to the limitations. The researchers are treasures of a country and governments should provide a good environment for the researchers to pursue the scientific researches. For instance, the government of Iran place a strict regulation on researches in genetic researches and restrict the research units in different aspects. They banned all the private research institutes and try to monopolize the genetic researches. So there are numerous Iranian researchers who live the country to pursue their researches in a better place.
On the other hand, there are some kinds of researches which require the maximum restriction from the governments because they are so important researches and related to the national security or public health which is prone to spoiling from others. For example, governments define a strict regulation for their scientific researches in defense industry and developments in army. They believe that these researches are very important to the country and they should control all the aspects of the developments in order to prevent the leakage of these precious information.
To sum it up, there are different circumstances in scientific researches and with regard to the type of the researches governments should take a proper action. Most of the scientific researches do not require government restriction whereas there are sensitive fields which require government surveillance and restrictions.
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 70
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 60
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...ientific research and development. I am agree with the statement because of the reaso...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...governments. These researches have long term benefits to the governments and society...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, so, whereas, for example, for instance, first of all, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 368.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70652173913 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21858453197 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45652173913 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 642.6 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6967799518 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308996060764 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120227099577 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493037885533 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212614543049 0.150359130593 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250687874844 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.1639044944 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.